Welcome to another snowless weekend - aaghh. Withdrawal symptoms?
Moi? Oh yes indeed - so much so, that it's back off to the Alps
during the coming week for a bit more high altitude exposure,
rather than having to negotiate the rocks that are jutting out
of the 'home pistes' - not to mention just a little overcrowding
due to the limited snow cover that has plagued the season.
Oops - sorry - I nearly forgot WICS is about stocks trading,
and that your interest in my sliding around on planks is probably
minimal at best.
Onward then to "the markets".
You'll doubtless recall that I've been mentioning 'M & A'
activity these past few weeks, suggesting that there will likely
be quite a lot of it as the year progresses, and we can now add
EMI/Warner (Possible merger) to the list, as well as Countrywide
Estate Agents (Acquisition) - not to mention the current rumours
of the latter effect regarding Debenhams. Amazing - and certainly
another indicator that "The Top" (aka the end of the
bull run) is close at hand. Nonetheless, it's highly likely that
Europe's major indices, FTSE included, still have a fair bit more
energy to dissipate to the upside, so the fat lady hasn't entered
stage left just yet - she's clearing her throat in anticipation
but her matinee performance will be in the USA for sure - 'Insider
Deals' (the equivalent of 'Director Dealings' in the UK) are running
now at an all time high across the pond, in the 'sell' direction.
In effect, we're watching the closing acts of the overall bull
phase, and like all closing acts, they'll be followed by the fireworks
- and I confess to a certain impatience the nearer we get to them
- not a good emotion for a supposedly professional trader! All
the more reason to step back a little and take a few days off
- and I'm not being at all facetious in saying that. Whenever
you feel a bit 'stale' or you sense that somehow you're a little
'disconnected' from the markets - in whatever way - then by far
the best advice you can give yourself is "Take a few days
off." You will never regret having done so. (I don't feel
in the least 'stale' though - just impatient and a tad unfit through
too little skiing - I hate having to cut out the afternoon patisserie
when the weight creeps ever upwards!)
Moving along - but still vaguely on the "psychological trail",
you will of course know that Lloyds TSB announced a profit of
£3.71bn during the week, after HSBC had published their
record - breaking results. Several emails (after the HSBC announcement)
asked whether buying Lloyds TSB in anticipation of their results
might be a good idea, and several more told me a few of you had
already done so. Hmmm - have a wee look at the Lloyds chart -
it's a great example of NOT listening to 'The News'.
Next, it appears that the last couple of WICS (where an email
question and my reply were included), have been particularly well
received - so whenever I get a question that might be of interest
to others, I'll reproduce it and my response. Have no fear - I'll
never use anything other than totally anonymously so please don't
be inhibited in your mentoring requests. I promise that I'm more
than happy to help and as mentioned in the manual, the only 'stupid'
question is the one you don't ask! (I'm not of course promising
that every answer will be helpful - but if it's not, please tell
me and I'll try harder next time!)
Anyway, here's another one for you: (my replies are in bold type
- and the prices are now of course out of date, which is of no
consequence.)
"Ian, I placed a buy order for Amec at 472.0 on Monday.
On Friday the market gapped and I was filled at 490.6, the price
closed at 478.7 and I was showing a loss.
Presumably the correct thing to do is continue with the trade
because if the analysis is right, then I will eventually come
into profit. However, where do I place my stop loss with an
entry price of 490.6, if I follow the 20dma, then I risk more
than 4% of my bank and if keep my potential loss to 4% of bank
I am above the dma? Any advice would be most welcome.>>>once
in, you're in! SL needs to remain where you intended in the
first place - 20 dma looks a bit tight to me - 25 with some
leeway would suggest 449? Gaps are always a pest in such cases
but your analysis was good & the statistics suggest you
won't likely lose more than 4%. Any individual trade of course
can buck the statistics but we need to deal in probabilities
overall.
Normally I am at work when the market opens and do not have
access to the screens, however, this Friday I was at home until
8:30 a.m. On inspection I found my order was not filled until
turned 8:20, the market had been well above my order for some
time (I checked with the FT charts later) but nothing had happened.
I admit to mixed feelings; on the one
hand, I had been right about the share but on the other my foresight
had seen me with a loss at the end of the day>>>>
that is meaningless overall!. I wonder whether I should
be moving the bulk of my business to another spread bettor.
Again any comment on their competency would be helpful - but
am I right to expect quicker action from my company or do I
have to live with these events as part of trading life?>>>
there's always a rush at that time of day but rarely
would it work that badly against you overall. They can only
deal with fills on a '1st come 1st served' basis & it would
have depended on how much interest there had been in Amec at
the time - a lot - obviously, as evidenced by the gap up. But
you should always have at least 2 Spread Bet accounts available
to you."
Just one point to add to the above, and that is that you really
MUST consider having at least two spread betting accounts available,
because not everyone offers everything. I always recommend (to
beginners in particular) a 'Trading Academy' account with Finspreads,
because of the facility to trade at very small stakes for a couple
of months. Sure, the spreads tend to be wide, but nothing is totally
free! (Oh, and just to clarify something for the more cynical
among you: no spread bet company nor brokerage pays me anything
no matter how many accounts are opened via TTEW. I have NO financial
interest whatever in such matters - so you can be 100% certain
that I have no bias in that regard.)
On to today's charts then, and as mentioned above, we'll take
a quick look at Lloyds TSB just because it rather proves the point
that a belief that "big profits" will by definition
= "price jump", may not necessarily indicate which way
the price is likely to jump! Then we'll examine JJB Sports, which
was the subject of a question from one of you that I answered
in WICS of 11th February - have a read of that as you examine
the chart. Finally, we'll see on the chart of Experian, that triangle
formations can sometimes develop over a long timescale - just
to give you a 'feel' for studying such things over whatever timescale
they form. If you type 'triangle' or 'triangles' into the search
engine, you'll find lots to compare Experian with - and I trust
you'll see that triangles can evolve over as short a time as a
couple of weeks, or very much longer indeed.
And that's all for this weekend - I'll be back at my desk next
weekend and I look forward to speaking to you again then - it
would be helpful if you can 'hold' mentoring enquiries till I
get back some time next Saturday afternoon.
All the best,
Ian.



'IMPORTANT
NOTICE: These WICS charts are for EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. They
represent only MY understanding of what is happening in the market
for any particular share, stock, commodity or index. In NO circumstances
should they be construed as recommendations to trade. If I choose
to trade what I see, that is MY decision. YOU must, in turn, come
to YOUR OWN conclusions about what action, if any, YOU might choose
to take'
|