Trading the easy way offers  courses in trading, spread betting and stock market success

Hello again - not much visible 'change' this past week - just more of the "same old same old", as the US housing market slips slowly and somewhat less than gracefully beneath the waves, and the UK government finally acknowledges the likely cost of the Olympics may be just a tad higher than the amount originally spun to the public - and 'private equity' deals/proposed deals keep hitting the headlines, just as predicted. I haven't needed much of my scary Granny's second sight these past few months, that's for sure - even the most myopic can surely read the writing on the wall by now!

Quite a few minor US banks have now gone bust courtesy of mortgage - related difficulties, and more than one big bank will go down the pan before the year is out, of that I'm certain - but maybe an infusion of 'private equity' will save it. Hah. I see Blackstone (huge private equity firm - it owns Madame Tussauds and Centre Parcs, and a whole lot more besides) is planning a Stock Market flotation to enable the gullible and the greedy to make its current owners very rich indeed - did I mention dummies last weekend? It looks like the next private equity targets will be Alliance Boots and Cadbury's, and more will follow during this final feeding frenzy - 'final' because when the crash comes, private equity deals will be as out of favour as package holidays to Baghdad, until the next turn of the wheel brings them back again to prominence - it was ever thus.

The game is called 'pass the parcel' when children play it, and it's cleverly done - buy up a few companies using massive debt to do so, package the whole thing to look like the fat cats are making megabucks from the deal (they are not making anything at that stage - but nor are they servicing the debt because their bankers - who are totally complicit - are giving them a 'repayment holiday' for a year or so - plenty time to arrange the flotation. Then the 'spin' is that YOU too can make big profits, just like the fat cats, because you will be able to buy some of the shares when the whole sorry mess becomes listed on a Stock Market. Needless to say, the punters queue up and at least a zillion dollars is raised. The debt gets partially repaid, the balance is transferred to the newly listed company, the fat cats retire to their lair and spend several months counting the profits they made from the sale of their original holdings - and they are no longer liable for any of the remaining debt because it's the new company's shareholders who pick up that particular tab.....why didn't I think of trying that myself years ago? By now I could have bought my own ski resort, and a helicopter to reach it...and banned all snowboarders from approaching within 20 miles.)

Moving along, one of you (thanks Sue) was asking about finding 'sell' trades at the moment, and suggesting it was quite hard to do so because all too often, a price would drop below support, or out of a triangle, or start to change trend, or whatever - all per TTEW style trading - but then bounce back up again after having filled an order that ends up being stopped out for a loss.

That's an excellent question but quite a hard one to answer, in the sense that for me it's easy enough because I've 'seen it all before' but if you're relatively new to the game a series of 'perfect trades' that end up as losers, can be pretty demoralising - indeed they can result in your losing faith in your methodology. What to do about it? I'm afraid the only logical answer is that if it's a 'perfect trade' then you have to let it get on with things and accept that a losing run is inevitable at some stage. As I hinted above, that's not much of an answer, and very easy for ME to say because this methodology has become second nature to me and I trust it without reservation. The only thing to do if you feel uncomfortable (whatever methodology you might want to trust) is to take the 'trading break' I mentioned last weekend, and when you return, trade 'light' for a while as you rebuild confidence. There's little more annoying (to myself too!) than a run of 'perfect' losers, but as mentioned above, they go with the territory I'm afraid.

Speaking of the 'crash' that's now inevitable, it's been hard for me to concentrate these past few days, partly because we have some visitors from the Republic of Ireland with us at the moment and a very jolly time is being had, and partly because it has been difficult to stop laughing at the fact that Alan Greenspan (retired Federal Reserve Chairman and star opportunist of both last century and this one) has now decided he's a bear. "Turncoat" isn't in it as a description. "Destroyer of the savings of an entire generation" is closer, but still no cigar.

Anyway, onward to another email and my reply - these seem to be popular with you but if you get fed up with them, for goodness' sake let me know! (my replies are in bold type below in the body of my correspondent's email and then there's a more detailed response below that, and thanks to 'John' for the questions.)

"Ian - must say I'm licking my wounds somewhat after the correction of just over a couple of weeks ago although the damage was much less than it could have been. In fact because I had shorted HSBC my losses on my Long positions were almost cancelled by the Short on HSBC. The problem was that I was away and took my eye off the ball. Even so, I was stopped out at a small profit of £11.00 which is better than nothing although if I'd had access the chart I'd have closed the deal at around £90.00 profit.

>>>John - see below these brief replies for more detail.

Lost between £30 and £40 on each of the long trades I had. I learned a couple of things and that is always valuable. Firstly I assumed I had guaranteed stops but in fact I hadn't

.>>> see wics archive faqs. GSLs cost too much.

That fact alone would have greatly reduced my losses. Secondly I must check the prices and charts each day. Thirdly I always intend having a mix of long and short trades

.>>>or fewer trades if you can't find valid ones in a particular direction.

I started with around £500 and went up to £800 and am back to £580 so not doing too bad for six months. Better than the pension funds! I now want to start trading seriously having learned those lessons. What do you think is the best way to grow the fund? If I invest say £2000 to boost it somewhat is it better to spread the risk and have more trades on smallish bets or raise the level of the bet?

>>> if you have say 8 trades at the moment on your current bank, & can find no more, then a bigger bank = bigger stakes rather than seeking more trades for their own sake. Don't ever dilute your selection criteria. "

And here's the more detailed reply I gave:

"John -some more re your questions above: it's very hard to answer regarding 'how much money' because everyone is just so different in their reaction both to profits and to losses. What I mean is, that as soon as one 'needs' a profit, emotion starts to creep in to one's thinking, and rational analysis begins to take a back seat. When you're 'trading light' and in the early phases of a trading career, with little financial commitment, it's easy enough to be totally objective.

Once you're committing more funds with a view to living off the proceeds, then losing trades really hurt - certainly to begin with. Equally, winning trades are seen in 'paper profit' terms and all too often they're closed out by the trader, rather than having been stopped out by market action - thus making 'more' on an individual basis, but a whole lot less overall because the big winners aren't allowed to run and run. This happens to almost everyone - and the only 'cure' is to back off and trade 'light' again, then build up slowly to the point where you once more feel uncomfortable. For some people the path to trading say £30 - £50 per point is quite quick, while for others, it's a slow and painful process. Your comment about HSBC (you 'would have closed..for £90..') suggests to me you might find leaving trades to run, could be a bit difficult for you at the moment.

To make £5000 a month quickly (as you would need to do ref your other target of £100k in 2 years) from a bank of £2500 would be next to impossible in practical terms in my view. You would need to take big risks with large chunks of the bank and/or hold stop losses way too tight to be able to afford suitable trades - and almost by definition, you would be 'trading scared', which never works.

To make £100000 within 2 years would need to be viewed in the light of the above remarks. Yes, it's possible, but it's improbable from a starting bank of £2500.

To make £5000 from a starting capital of £2500, over maybe 6 months or so, would be a much more manageable initial goal - but I still prefer to see people express goals in 'points' rather than cash. Once you know you can reasonably confidently take around 200 nett points consistently each month from the markets, it's much easier psychologically to apply more and more cash to the exercise without worrying too much about the losers.

I have a guy who started experimenting with a £2000 bank and who did very well, doubling it over 4 months or so. The next time I heard from him, he was seeking my help because everything had gone terribly wrong. It turned out he had inherited £300000 or so and he (prudently in his mind) increased his trading bank to £100k, in the 'certain knowledge' that trading would then make him rich. He emailed me when his bank was below £50k - and in a nutshell, the problem was 100% psychological - he couldn't stand seeing 'small' losing trades costing him maybe £1000 - £2000, and when he had a £1000 winner, he would close it out and grab the profit. He began seeing trades purely in 'cash value' terms, and his emotions (being unused to the bigger bank) got the better of him. (He's OK now, all being well, and trading from a bank of £10k while he gets used to ignoring cash values. Then he'll move to £20k but if he feels worried, he'll come back down to £15k - and so on. 'Psychology' is what almost everyone fails to take account of.)

Now I guess the foregoing might seem less than encouraging, but I wouldn't want to mislead you. The only way forward is 'step by step' in this game - but you may be assured I'll help as much as I can."

Onward then to today's charts and first we'll look at 'sells' on HMV, then we'll examine what might be about to happen to the German DAX index - again, I hope these may help those who have some concerns overall regarding 'sell' trades.

All the best then until next weekend, when all being well WICS should be online by late Saturday evening 24th March.

Ian.

TTEW

TTEW

'IMPORTANT NOTICE: These WICS charts are for EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. They represent only MY understanding of what is happening in the market for any particular share, stock, commodity or index. In NO circumstances should they be construed as recommendations to trade. If I choose to trade what I see, that is MY decision. YOU must, in turn, come to YOUR OWN conclusions about what action, if any, YOU might choose to take'
Page Top

Home | Seminars | Home Study Course | W.I.C.S
Links | Client Comments | FAQ

Trading The Easy Way © | Website by Colin Jones Design